SBF's lawyer completed the closing argument and insisted on defending SBF not guilty.
SBF's attorney Mark S. Cohen completed his closing argument in court on Wednesday evening local time, requesting the court and jury to find that SBF acted in "good faith" throughout its operation of FTX and Alameda Research, and therefore cannot be found guilty of fraud. In his closing argument, the attorney stated that it was "real-world miscommunications," "mistakes," and "delays" that harmed other members of FTX and Bankman-Fried's crypto empire, not intentional fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Will there be a Solana ETF by the end of 2025?
Cboe BZX filed four applications for spot Solana ETFs earlier this week.The approval path for additional spot crypto ETFs should become clearer with a pro-crypto White House administration.
Changes at the SEC start well ahead of Inauguration Day
One federal judge’s rulings this week found that the SEC had overstepped its authority and must vacate the Dealer Rule
Today's Fear and Greed Index fell slightly to 93, and the level is still extremely greedy