Ціна Ampleforth Governance TokenFORTH

A Massachusetts appellate court shut the door on an unusual legal battle in which customer Lourenco Garcia sought to hold Santander Bank responsible for a $751,000 loss he suffered in a cryptocurrency scam. According to the court ruling , neither Santander’s customer agreement nor Massachusetts law requires the bank to block or investigate customer-authorized transactions, even when those transfers are tied to apparent fraud. In the period from December 2021 to January 2022, Garcia made two debit card purchases and seven wire transfers from his checking and savings accounts to the Metropolitan Commercial Bank of New York. The funds were subsequently used to purchase cryptocurrency via Crypto.com and a supposed trading platform called CoinEgg. However, Garcia later realized CoinEgg was a scam, leading to his $751,000 loss. He sued Santander for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and violating Massachusetts consumer protection law. The argument was that the bank should have spotted and stopped the high‑risk transactions. The appeals panel, however, rejected all of Garcia’s claims. It pointed to Santander’s customer agreement, which states the bank may act when it suspects fraud—but isn’t obligated to do so. The court further emphasized that Massachusetts regulators have not imposed any blanket requirement for banks to monitor or block all potentially suspicious transactions. Garcia also cited language on Santander’s website promising the bank would “contact a customer” about questionable activity. However, the court found that such marketing language was not a binding legal duty. Critically, Garcia had personally authorized every transfer. He didn’t raise concerns with the bank until the funds were gone. Though the court’s decision holds limited precedential weight, it delivers a clear message: banks are not financial guardians against crypto-related losses, especially when customer-approved transactions. With crypto scams on the rise and regulatory scrutiny tightening, financial institutions are increasingly leaning on the exact terms of their customer agreements to shield themselves from liability. As this case illustrates, individuals moving large sums into speculative digital assets must do their own due diligence and implement personal safeguards against fraud. Garcia filed the original complaint in October 2022. After two years of legal back-and-forth—and decisions by both the Superior Court and the appeals court in Santander’s favor—his efforts to reclaim his lost fortune have ended in disappointment. This ruling is particularly timely, as crypto scams have been on the rise, and regulators are intensifying their scrutiny of digital asset markets. Data shows that crypto rug pulls wiped out nearly $6 billion in Q1 2025, up 6,500% from just $90 million a year earlier. Web3 projects have lost nearly $6 billion to rug pulls since the beginning of 2025, a 6,499% increase from the $90 million recorded during the same period last year, according to a new DappRadar report . As DappRadar’s blockchain analyst Sara Gherghelas notes, a single case accounts for most of the damage, as 92% of the amount “is tied to the Mantra incident,” which she describes as “one of the largest individual scams recorded in recent years.” Cryptopolitan Academy: Want to grow your money in 2025? Learn how to do it with DeFi in our upcoming webclass. Save Your Spot

A new SEC filing reveals that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon offloaded 133,639 shares, valued at approximately $31.5 million. The transaction, executed at an average price of $235 per share on April 14, leaves Dimon with direct ownership of 1.32 million shares. He maintains additional indirect holdings through family trusts, 401(k) accounts, grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs), and a limited liability company. At JPMorgan Chase, Dimon was historically seen as a long-term holder, making major purchases in 2007, 2009, 2012, and 2016 — typically during periods of market uncertainty. However, since last year, he has shifted to selling. In 2024, Dimon sold about 1 million shares in total, executed in two transactions. In February 2024, he sold approximately 821,778 shares worth around $150 million. Two months later, in April, he sold the remaining 178,222 shares, worth about $33 million. In February, Dimon sold another $233 million worth of company stock, equivalent to more than 11% of his holdings. Dimon’s stock sale comes as JPMorgan Chase is off to a strong start this year. Last week, the Wall Street giant reported better-than-expected profits in the first quarter. However, despite the strong numbers, the bank is still very cautious about the economic outlook amid trade tensions. The return of Donald Trump to the presidency initially boosted business confidence, but that optimism was shaken when his administration introduced steep new tariffs on many countries. However, these tariffs have been temporarily paused. These back-and-forth moves have added to market instability. Dimon noted last week that middle-market clients are scaling back investments and deals due to market uncertainty. JPMorgan, the largest US bank by assets, has maintained a strong lead over its peers throughout Dimon’s nearly 20-year tenure. Dimon has signaled that succession planning is in motion. Last May, he indicated that his tenure was “not five years anymore,” prompting speculation he could step down by 2025 or 2026. However, Dimon plans to stay on as CEO for the next few years, with a possible transition to chairman later.

#Forth 2nd Tp Hit

#Forth ist tp hit 🎯 did anyone made profit from my signal ?

#Forth/usdt Long Entry 2.79 2.73 TP 2.87 2.95 SL 2.65