DSC Mix narxMIX

Base + Vitalik terrible mix for $eth lol

Bitcoin developers are proposing a critical upgrade to protect the cryptocurrency from emerging quantum computing threats. Recently, Agustin Cruz put forward the proposal known as the Quantum-Resistant Address Migration Protocol (QRAMP) in the form of BIP. The proposed upgrade includes a hard fork that requires the users to transfer their funds before a specific date. If the users do not follow the rule, the nodes in the network will decline their transactions with no chance of reversal. Cruz has forwarded code and an approach to erase coins still protected by BTC with the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), a cryptographic algorithm expected to be hackable with a quantum compass in the next few years. While no quantum computer poses a threat to Bitcoin at the moment, experts believe that this could happen in about a decade. The QRAMP proposal is designed to allocate the blockchain that is associated with the biggest digital asset by market capitalization beforehand. The proposal generated a lot of controversy on the Bitcoin forums and developers’ chats. Other opponents believe that a cut-off approach will completely deny access to the minority who fails to migrate before the stipulated time. QRAMP could have an impact on Bitcoin’s circulating supply because unclaimed coins become effectively unusable if not moved prior to a given period of time. Cruz also supports the strategy, citing that it directs the users on how to protect their assets. However, critics hold a crucial concern as pockets with no interaction, potentially associated with the true holder of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto , would also be excluded. These coins in such wallets could be removed as invalid if they remain untouched, raising concerns over the potential contraction of supply in the cryptocurrency. The primary challenge of executing a hard fork lies in a decentralized system that requires the approval of some consensus. Online discussions show a mix of support, caution, and resistance. No official BIP number has been assigned to the proposal yet, and it is still being discussed with other active developers. Quantum computing is still progressing and, therefore, still poses concerns for blockchain developers. Quantum computing threatens cryptography by yielding significant capability to process a large amount of data using quantum bits or qubits. While the mining algorithm, SHA-256 currently still holds up to its position, the ECDSA implemented for signing transactions can be vulnerable to quantum attacks. Cruz’s warning is based on the fact that old public keys, which are used in previous transactions, might be vulnerable to exploitation in the future, should quantum systems become powerful enough. This risk would be mitigated by migrating to quantum-resistant wallets, which would provide new levels of cryptographic security for the funds. The QRAMP plan entails tools provided by the wallet providers and the block explorers, preparing the users for the transition. These nodes were at risk of operating in a network that was incompatible with the new protocol post-deadline. Cruz also states that Bitcoin can embrace innovations from quantum-secure blockchains like BTQ in enhancing the system.

7/ Top Delegates Arbitrum DAO just turned 2 y/o and its key players have shifted over time. Today's top delegates include a mix of familiar names and rising forces: 🔹 Early voices like @l2beat, @wintermute_t, @muxprotocol, @OlimpioCrypto, and @blockworksres. 🔹 Later entrants

UBS has urged investors to remain steady during recent market turbulence, offering three core rationales to support continued confidence despite escalating volatility. In a note issued April 3, the bank’s U.S. editorial team pointed to historical resilience of market downturns, the protective benefits of a liquidity strategy, and the tactical opportunities presented by heightened price swings. First, UBS emphasized that while painful, market sell-offs are generally temporary. The firm highlighted that market declines of over 10% are considered corrections, while drops beyond 20% constitute bear markets. The S&P 500 is currently in correction territory, but UBS advised investors to plan for the possibility of a bear market. The bank detailed: During bear markets since World War II, the S&P 500 fell an average of 32% from peak to trough, and it took an average of three years before reaching a new all-time high. Those with diversified holdings saw smaller losses; a 60/40 stock-bond mix declined an average of 19%, recovering in approximately two years and three months. Next, UBS explained the importance of a liquidity strategy to prevent lasting losses during market downturns. “With this financial cushion, we can maintain our lifestyle comfortably while we wait for markets to recover,” the firm stated. “A well-funded liquidity strategy—holding enough cash, bonds, and borrowing capacity to cover spending needs for the next 3–5 years—is enough to fully insulate our day-to-day spending from market volatility.” UBS added: “Tapping into the liquidity strategy instead of liquidating investments at ‘bear market prices’ can help us to avoid the risk of permanently locking in losses.” Lastly, UBS encouraged clients to view volatility as a chance to act strategically. This includes portfolio rebalancing and tax-loss harvesting. The bank shared: Volatility tends to improve the risk/return profile of options strategies and structured investments, allowing you to potentially increase your portfolio’s yield and/or growth potential while maintaining protection against potential losses. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Global markets saw a distinct “risk-off” rotation in March 2025, with cryptocurrencies and equities retreating as investor fear prompted a flight to perceived safer ground like select commodities and bonds. Bitcoin’s decline occurred alongside struggles in broader equity markets, highlighting the impact of increasing global economic uncertainty. While crypto markets faced sharp selloffs, Bitcoin registered a moderate decline in March, falling below its average return over the past year. Ethereum fared worse, posting the steepest monthly loss among major assets listed in the analysis source (ecoinometrics), tumbling over 20% . Related: Bitcoin’s Trump Tariff Test: Down to $82k, Can $78k Support Endure? This downturn brought to light the heightened risk sensitivity for digital assets during periods of macroeconomic stressors when there is reduced investor appetite. Conversely, traditional safe-haven gold attracted fresh demand as market fears escalated, delivering strong returns and highlighting defensive positioning. Copper also saw an unexpected rally, potentially driven by tariff-related concerns about supply chains or infrastructure demand. Crude oil advanced as well, though less than gold or copper, likely reflecting a mix of geopolitical tension and cautious energy demand outlooks. Bonds saw slight positive returns, with the long-duration Treasury ETF (TLT) gaining modestly. This movement indicated increased investor preference for safety and capital preservation over chasing yield. Related: Trump Tariffs Shock Markets: Crypto Loses $100B, Bitcoin Price Unstable Global stock markets mirrored crypto’s downward trend. Major indices like the NASDAQ 100, S&P 500, Nikkei 225, and Eurostoxx 50 all closed lower for March, many performing well below their 12-month average returns and reinforcing the broad-based weakness driven by investor concerns. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.