Prezzo di AchainACT

Bitcoin (BTC) has been on a wild ride, recently experiencing a sharp drop before bouncing back above $90,000. After reaching an all-time high (ATH) near $110,000, BTC has struggled with increased selling pressure, leading to a pullback that tested the $80,000 support level. With BTC price now hovering around $91,000, traders are left wondering— will Bitcoin crash below $80,000 , or is this just a temporary correction before a new ATH rally? Let’s analyze BTC’s key levels, indicators, and potential price movements to determine the most likely scenario. Bitcoin’s price action suggests that $80,000 has acted as a strong support level, with buyers stepping in aggressively to prevent further downside. The latest bounce above $90,000 indicates some bullish recovery, but BTC still needs to break above $95,000-$97,000 to confirm a reversal. If Bitcoin maintains its momentum and closes above $95,000, it could signal a shift toward a renewed bullish phase, with the next key resistance near $100,000-$105,000. However, if BTC fails to reclaim these levels, it may face another drop back to $85,000 or lower. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 47, indicating that BTC is neither overbought nor oversold. However, just a few days ago, RSI dipped into the oversold region below 30, which triggered the recent price bounce. If RSI climbs above 55-60, it would indicate strengthening bullish momentum, potentially pushing BTC toward $100,000 . On the other hand, if RSI drops back below 40, it could suggest another wave of selling pressure. The Heikin Ashi candles are showing a slight shift in trend, with green candles forming after a series of strong red ones. If BTC can sustain this bullish momentum, we may see a continued recovery in the coming days. For Bitcoin to reclaim its bullish structure , it must break and hold above $95,000-$97,000, which is the first resistance zone. If BTC price successfully crosses this barrier, it will open the doors for a move toward $100,000-$105,000, where major resistance is expected. A confirmed breakout above $105,000 would likely set the stage for BTC to challenge its previous ATH near $110,000. However, failure to break $95,000 could result in another pullback, leading to a retest of the $80,000-$85,000 support zone. If Bitcoin loses the $80,000 support level , the next critical zone to watch is $75,000-$77,000, which could act as a short-term demand zone. A break below $75,000 would signal deeper trouble, potentially dragging BTC price down to $70,000 or even $65,000. While a crash below $80,000 seems unlikely unless a macro-level catalyst triggers panic selling, traders should closely monitor Bitcoin’s daily closes to confirm if the bullish momentum is fading. Bitcoin’s price action suggests that $80,000 is a strong support level, but for BTC to confirm a bullish trend, it must break above $95,000-$97,000 and hold. If BTC clears $100,000, we could see another rally toward $110,000 and beyond. For short-term traders, waiting for a breakout confirmation above $95,000 would be ideal. Meanwhile, long-term investors might view dips toward $80,000-$85,000 as potential accumulation zones.

Japan proposes new crypto rules, potential tax cuts and ETF approval Astar (ASTR) founder Sota Watanabe announced on X that Japan’s ruling party has proposed regulating crypto under a new framework within the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. If passed this year, it could lead to crypto ETF approvals and lower taxes from 55% to 20%. Cryptocurrencies would also be classified as a new asset type, not securities. Watanabe called it a major win for the industry, highlighting strong cooperation between the government and industry leaders.

Japan proposes new crypto rules, potential tax cuts and ETF approval Astar $ASTR founder Sota Watanabe announced on X that Japan’s ruling party has proposed regulating crypto under a new framework within the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. If passed this year, it could…

Hex Trust has received a Major Payment Institution License from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, allowing it to offer cross-border money transfer services. Cryptocurrency custodian Hex Technologies Pte. Ltd. said on Thursday, March 6, it received a license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore that would allow it to offer a “fully-integrated solution” including custody, over-the-counter trading, and settlement, including fiat on and off ramps. In a press release shared with crypto.news, Calvin Shen, CEO of Hex Technologies Pte. Ltd., said Singapore remains a “key market” for Hex Trust, adding that the milestone now allows the custodian to double down on its offerings for institutional clients. “Securing the MPI license is a testament to our team’s dedication to working closely with the MAS to meet its regulatory requirements. With a well-established regulatory framework and commitment to innovation, Singapore continues to drive institutional adoption of digital assets.” Calvin Shen For Hex Trust, the latest license marks another regulatory achievement in Singapore , where the custodian previously secured approvals. In 2021, it obtained the Capital Markets Services license, allowing it to provide custodial services regulated under Singapore’s Securities and Futures Act. Outside Singapore, Hex Trust also holds licenses and registrations in Hong Kong, Dubai, France, and Italy. In February, Hex Trust secured a strategic funding round led by Morgan Creek Digital with participation from global investors including Injective, bringing its total funding to over $100 million. That investment marked a “pivotal milestone,” Hex Trust said in a blog announcement, as it prepares for its Series C raise anticipated later in 2025.

We are now seeing the revolution of money. The battle between traditional government-issued currencies and cryptocurrency reshapes the financial ecosystem. This is forcing individuals, businesses, and policymakers to rethink the very nature of money itself. While fiat currencies have ruled for centuries under government control, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are challenging this monopoly, presenting a borderless, censorship-resistant alternative. But are cryptocurrencies the future of finance, or do they remain a speculative asset vulnerable to volatility and regulatory crackdowns? This article breaks down the core differences between crypto and fiat, looking at their impact on economic stability, inflation, security, and global adoption. The key difference between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies is who controls them. Fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar (USD) and the Euro (EUR), are government-issued and centrally regulated. Their supply is controlled through monetary policies, such as interest rate adjustments and money printing. Fiat currencies also have unlimited supplies, as governments can print more money as needed, which can lead to inflation. This happened during the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19 stimulus programs. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies are decentralized and operate on blockchain networks without government control. Transactions are verified through decentralized consensus mechanisms, such as Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS. Also, cryptocurrencies have limited supplies. For instance, Bitcoin (BTC) has a fixed cap (21 million BTC), making it resistant to inflation. Additionally, unlike fiat, crypto can be sent globally without intermediaries or banking restrictions like fiat. One of the most significant differences between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is how governments regulate and recognize them. Fiat currencies operate within strict legal frameworks, while cryptocurrencies exist in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape that varies by country. Fiat currencies are fully regulated and enforced by law. Central banks, such as the Federal Reserve (U.S.) and the European Central Bank (ECB), control their issuance and ensure stability through monetary policies. Conversely, cryptocurrencies operate in a legal gray area in many regions. Some countries have embraced them, while others have banned or restricted their use due to concerns over illicit activity, tax evasion, and financial stability. While fiat transactions are private but heavily monitored, cryptocurrencies, depending on the blockchain, provide varying degrees of transparency and pseudonymity. Fiat transactions are not publicly visible, but banks, financial institutions, and government agencies heavily track them. Cryptocurrencies operate on public ledgers, where transactions are visible to anyone, but user identities are not directly linked to wallet addresses. Fiat currencies have an unlimited supply controlled by governments, while many cryptocurrencies have fixed or limited issuance, making them resistant to inflation. As mentioned earlier, fiat is issued by central banks, which can increase or decrease the money supply to influence economic conditions. However, excessive money printing can lead to inflation or hyperinflation, reducing purchasing power. Fiat currency is naturally inflationary, as it loses value over time due to the continuous expansion of the money supply. Additionally, it has hyperinflation risks, as countries with weak economic policies can experience severe inflation, drastically devaluing their currency. For instance, Venezuela’s inflation rate exceeded 1,000,000% in 2018 due to excessive money printing, rendering its currency nearly worthless. Unlike fiat currency, most cryptocurrencies have a predetermined supply that cannot be changed by a central authority, making them deflationary or resistant to inflation. Also, Ethereum moved to Proof of Stake (PoS), reducing its supply through burning mechanisms (EIP-1559). Fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies handle transactions differently. While fiat transactions rely on banks and financial intermediaries, cryptocurrencies use decentralized blockchain networks to process payments without intermediaries. Fiat transactions are processed through banks, payment networks (Visa, Mastercard), and financial institutions that act as intermediaries. Banks often allow fraudulent or mistaken transactions to be disputed and reversed. Cryptocurrency, however, operates on blockchain networks, where transactions are verified by miners (Proof of Work) or validators (Proof of Stake). Transactions are sent directly between users without banks or payment processors. Once confirmed, transactions cannot be reversed, which reduces fraud but removes chargeback protections. Security is crucial in fiat and cryptocurrency transactions, but the risks and protective measures differ. Fiat transactions rely on centralized oversight and consumer protection laws, while cryptocurrencies use cryptographic security but are vulnerable to hacking and scams. Banks, financial regulators, and anti-fraud systems safeguard fiat transactions. However, centralization makes them vulnerable to identity theft and institutional failures. Banks employ fraud detection, encryption, and transaction monitoring to prevent unauthorized access. Meanwhile, credit card companies and banks allow users to dispute fraudulent transactions and recover lost funds. However, government currency is poised to fiat-based fraud, including identity theft, counterfeit currency, and bank fraud, which remains a significant problem. For example, in 2023, credit card fraud losses exceeded $30 billion worldwide, driven by data breaches and phishing attacks. In contrast to government currency, cryptocurrencies leverage blockchain and cryptography for enhanced security, but the lack of a central authority means users bear full responsibility for protecting their funds. Meanwhile, Crypto wallets and exchanges are frequent targets for hacks, phishing attacks, and rug pulls. Losing a private key means permanent loss of funds. For instance, the Bybit exchange was hacked in February, and hackers stole $1.4 billion in the largest single hack in crypto history. Related: Bybit CEO: $1.4 Billion Crypto Hack Tracked, Majority Potentially Recoverable Meanwhile, crypto users rely on self-custody security. They must safeguard their assets using hardware wallets, multi-signature security, and strong authentication methods. One of the contrasts between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is their level of price stability. While fiat currencies are relatively stable thanks to central bank controls, cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, with prices fluctuating rapidly based on market demand. Fiat currencies maintain relatively stable value due to government regulation and monetary policies. For example, the U.S. dollar has lost over 97% of its purchasing power since 1913 due to inflation. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies experience extreme price swings, often moving 10–20% daily due to speculation, investor sentiment, and market demand. For example, Bitcoin reached its all-time high in January 2025, when it traded above $109,000, but it is currently trading below $88,000. The adoption of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies differs significantly. While fiat is universally accepted and legally required for transactions, crypto adoption is growing but remains limited due to regulatory uncertainty and volatility. Fiat currencies are the default medium of exchange in every country. They are legally enforced, meaning businesses and individuals must accept them for transactions. However, despite their rapid growth, cryptocurrencies are not universally accepted and face regulatory challenges that limit their mainstream use. The environmental impact of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies varies significantly. While fiat money production consumes physical resources, cryptocurrencies, especially Proof-of-Work (PoW) networks like Bitcoin, require high energy consumption for mining. However, newer crypto models are becoming more eco-friendly. The production and circulation of fiat currencies involve printing banknotes, minting coins, and running financial infrastructure. For instance, the U.S. Federal Reserve prints over $700 billion in new banknotes annually, requiring vast amounts of paper and ink. While this has an environmental impact, it is relatively low compared to energy-intensive crypto mining. On the other hand, cryptocurrency mining, particularly Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains, consumes vast amounts of energy due to computational mining processes. However, newer models are reducing their carbon footprint. For instance, Bitcoin’s annual energy consumption is estimated at 86 TWh, which is comparable to Argentina’s entire electricity usage. However, more than 50% of Bitcoin mining is powered by renewable energy. Both fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies are undergoing significant transformations due to technological advancements, regulatory shifts, and changing global economic conditions. Governments and central banks are adapting to digital innovation by modernizing fiat currency infrastructure and exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Related: Swiss National Bank: Crypto Not Ready for Prime Time, CBDC Is Key Crypto markets have seen major innovations in blockchain scalability, regulation, and institutional adoption, which have driven mainstream interest and investment. The debate between government currencies and cryptocurrencies is not limited to technology but also concerns the future of money itself. Government currencies have long been the foundation of global economies, offering stability, government backing, and universal acceptance. However, they are susceptible to inflation, central control, and economic manipulation. Conversely, cryptocurrencies represent a decentralized, transparent, and borderless alternative that empowers individuals to control their wealth without intermediaries. Yet, their volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and security risks remain significant challenges to mass adoption. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.