Prezzo di CoreCORE

1. Close Short Sell BTC @0.002 Open Long Buy BTC @0.001 2. Close Short Sell ETH @ 0.0002 Open Long Buy ETH @ 0.0001 Hello. As some of you or most of you like the stories, I have one for you. I’m not professional writer I speak mi mind as is. Some of you may wonder why and where is my nonsense coming from, why did I post such ridiculous trades and if I’m completely insane. Maybe, or Maybe Just Insane Enough. A little bit of history without exact dates as they are irrelevant. Some of you that familiar with an old twitter, may remember the time when everyone started posting about the time when all their hard earned trades and life savings disappeared overnight, some of you blamed the famous Pump on one of the exchanges, some of you blamed USDT, some of you blamed conspiracy theories and bad guys that caused you so much trouble. While some of it maybe true, it is unknown to me. I’m not a professional trader ( these guys require licensing and set of rules to follow ), I’m a regular human from nowhere. I have been studying trading for the past 14 years, from which at least 9 of them were mostly failures, well since I never gave up any projects throughout my Various careers I kept on studying more. There are no exact set of rules, and whoever tells you that this or that is the right away, simply tells you what worked for them in the past. Some have an amazing way of reading charts, some study the patterns, some do their research based on the numbers and data. I was inspired by Jim Simmons, as he was one of a few, in my opinion that truly got to the very core. I’ve studied their Algos ( they openly provide you with the trial ), I’ve studied pretty much every Algo available on the market. I developed my own. Through trial and error the Algo grew to several pages of script. It gotten to the point where it was so heavy that none of the computers available to me, were able to handle it. However it was not 100% correct, as nothing ever is, But it was extremely close to full 100%. I cannot even describe how many trades I have lost and how many won, especially when it came to Leverage. To make the point of my article - I’ll dive into it: There are no Scary Bears, Nor Scary Bulls, there are simply Traders with Crazy Amounts of Money available. As some of you may not understand the amounts: I’ll specify, the amounts are too big for crypto. A friend of mine many years ago to my question of why he did not trade the Crypto, answered that it was too small and he clwould eat the whole book. I did not quite understand it back then, and it took me years to learn why. While many of you like to trade Scalp distances, I have found the Swing Large trades more appealing to me. I could probably provide the smarter description of how many indicators and complex math calculations brought me to the trades that I have posted publicly, recently. It’s up to you which of them you find insane and which ones would make sense. Honestly it is irrelevant to me. No matter which way you trade, it does not really bother me a bit. However some of you that trade with smaller funds might find it beneficial to not loose all the money, but rather make some drastic life changes. I did not see anybody posting the upfront trade when the pump happened. I’m very surprised however, that some of you, including news did not read the whale alerts properly several years ago, for some reason the Short Sell at $12000 of BTC at Bybit was completely ignored and missed. While some interpreted as a big move down, the price skyrocketed Up. Well nobody told you upfront how much of BTC was really supposed to be sold and at which levels LOL. The trade however has been in progress ever since, not just one, many, for some strange reason many are so impressed and do not understand why Microstrategy (Strategy inc.) buys at every level, - they have their own agenda and plans, and while they have lists of funds the amounts of BTC not always available for them to purchase at lower prices. Some may read it as a Bullish sign, in my opinion it is irrelevant, only the time will tell if this company truly calculated all the issues of the market, if they truly prepared their books, and ready to withstand the true market volatility that has not been presented yet to us. Well it’s none of my business, I trade my very own strategy. My calculations pointed down to -$5000 , years ago, more than 4, and at the verge of 5 any minute now. I mention 4 years because it is known to some traders that trade 4 year cycles. I may even make the wild prediction that The trade that I have posted may happen this month of March( the months that proved throughout the history of the biggest months of Downtrends) I may in fact make a more wild prediction based on the years of my work and my Algorithm, that it may happen Any day now, Any minute, or even any second. There honestly won’t be too much of a warning ( you had the warning already of dormant wallets that were sleeping for years - already sold ) there won’t be enough time to place the orders because such volumes create unseen volatility. The ones that think that they will see what’s what, and place orders after, will - sadly be late. There is no guarantee that the Market will immediately recover, but it will at some point. More importantly a lot of junk projects will seize to exist or simply start their disappearance stage. Honestly there many not enough time to place Market Orders as I posted. These orders that I mentioned are calculated based on ideal circumstances, such as enough time for the price moves, alerts going off exactly as they supposed to, enough volume etc…… In Reality it will not be ideal, as alerts fail, and not everyone good at operating in the chaos. You might blame another insider trading or some president shilling the tokens they invested in, or some exchanges overloaded with customer order placements. Or in this case you could blame only yourself because you either discounted my message or did not simply see it, or it is, at that time will be it was too good or too bad to be true. Now couple of my favorite sayings ( please do not apply them to any others as I’m not affiliated with anybody ) that I like as a kid: As per Mandalorian - This is the Way, May the Forth be With You ( and I ) , and my favorite one - I have Spoken. #MR

We are now seeing the revolution of money. The battle between traditional government-issued currencies and cryptocurrency reshapes the financial ecosystem. This is forcing individuals, businesses, and policymakers to rethink the very nature of money itself. While fiat currencies have ruled for centuries under government control, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are challenging this monopoly, presenting a borderless, censorship-resistant alternative. But are cryptocurrencies the future of finance, or do they remain a speculative asset vulnerable to volatility and regulatory crackdowns? This article breaks down the core differences between crypto and fiat, looking at their impact on economic stability, inflation, security, and global adoption. The key difference between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies is who controls them. Fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar (USD) and the Euro (EUR), are government-issued and centrally regulated. Their supply is controlled through monetary policies, such as interest rate adjustments and money printing. Fiat currencies also have unlimited supplies, as governments can print more money as needed, which can lead to inflation. This happened during the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19 stimulus programs. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies are decentralized and operate on blockchain networks without government control. Transactions are verified through decentralized consensus mechanisms, such as Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS. Also, cryptocurrencies have limited supplies. For instance, Bitcoin (BTC) has a fixed cap (21 million BTC), making it resistant to inflation. Additionally, unlike fiat, crypto can be sent globally without intermediaries or banking restrictions like fiat. One of the most significant differences between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is how governments regulate and recognize them. Fiat currencies operate within strict legal frameworks, while cryptocurrencies exist in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape that varies by country. Fiat currencies are fully regulated and enforced by law. Central banks, such as the Federal Reserve (U.S.) and the European Central Bank (ECB), control their issuance and ensure stability through monetary policies. Conversely, cryptocurrencies operate in a legal gray area in many regions. Some countries have embraced them, while others have banned or restricted their use due to concerns over illicit activity, tax evasion, and financial stability. While fiat transactions are private but heavily monitored, cryptocurrencies, depending on the blockchain, provide varying degrees of transparency and pseudonymity. Fiat transactions are not publicly visible, but banks, financial institutions, and government agencies heavily track them. Cryptocurrencies operate on public ledgers, where transactions are visible to anyone, but user identities are not directly linked to wallet addresses. Fiat currencies have an unlimited supply controlled by governments, while many cryptocurrencies have fixed or limited issuance, making them resistant to inflation. As mentioned earlier, fiat is issued by central banks, which can increase or decrease the money supply to influence economic conditions. However, excessive money printing can lead to inflation or hyperinflation, reducing purchasing power. Fiat currency is naturally inflationary, as it loses value over time due to the continuous expansion of the money supply. Additionally, it has hyperinflation risks, as countries with weak economic policies can experience severe inflation, drastically devaluing their currency. For instance, Venezuela’s inflation rate exceeded 1,000,000% in 2018 due to excessive money printing, rendering its currency nearly worthless. Unlike fiat currency, most cryptocurrencies have a predetermined supply that cannot be changed by a central authority, making them deflationary or resistant to inflation. Also, Ethereum moved to Proof of Stake (PoS), reducing its supply through burning mechanisms (EIP-1559). Fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies handle transactions differently. While fiat transactions rely on banks and financial intermediaries, cryptocurrencies use decentralized blockchain networks to process payments without intermediaries. Fiat transactions are processed through banks, payment networks (Visa, Mastercard), and financial institutions that act as intermediaries. Banks often allow fraudulent or mistaken transactions to be disputed and reversed. Cryptocurrency, however, operates on blockchain networks, where transactions are verified by miners (Proof of Work) or validators (Proof of Stake). Transactions are sent directly between users without banks or payment processors. Once confirmed, transactions cannot be reversed, which reduces fraud but removes chargeback protections. Security is crucial in fiat and cryptocurrency transactions, but the risks and protective measures differ. Fiat transactions rely on centralized oversight and consumer protection laws, while cryptocurrencies use cryptographic security but are vulnerable to hacking and scams. Banks, financial regulators, and anti-fraud systems safeguard fiat transactions. However, centralization makes them vulnerable to identity theft and institutional failures. Banks employ fraud detection, encryption, and transaction monitoring to prevent unauthorized access. Meanwhile, credit card companies and banks allow users to dispute fraudulent transactions and recover lost funds. However, government currency is poised to fiat-based fraud, including identity theft, counterfeit currency, and bank fraud, which remains a significant problem. For example, in 2023, credit card fraud losses exceeded $30 billion worldwide, driven by data breaches and phishing attacks. In contrast to government currency, cryptocurrencies leverage blockchain and cryptography for enhanced security, but the lack of a central authority means users bear full responsibility for protecting their funds. Meanwhile, Crypto wallets and exchanges are frequent targets for hacks, phishing attacks, and rug pulls. Losing a private key means permanent loss of funds. For instance, the Bybit exchange was hacked in February, and hackers stole $1.4 billion in the largest single hack in crypto history. Related: Bybit CEO: $1.4 Billion Crypto Hack Tracked, Majority Potentially Recoverable Meanwhile, crypto users rely on self-custody security. They must safeguard their assets using hardware wallets, multi-signature security, and strong authentication methods. One of the contrasts between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is their level of price stability. While fiat currencies are relatively stable thanks to central bank controls, cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, with prices fluctuating rapidly based on market demand. Fiat currencies maintain relatively stable value due to government regulation and monetary policies. For example, the U.S. dollar has lost over 97% of its purchasing power since 1913 due to inflation. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies experience extreme price swings, often moving 10–20% daily due to speculation, investor sentiment, and market demand. For example, Bitcoin reached its all-time high in January 2025, when it traded above $109,000, but it is currently trading below $88,000. The adoption of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies differs significantly. While fiat is universally accepted and legally required for transactions, crypto adoption is growing but remains limited due to regulatory uncertainty and volatility. Fiat currencies are the default medium of exchange in every country. They are legally enforced, meaning businesses and individuals must accept them for transactions. However, despite their rapid growth, cryptocurrencies are not universally accepted and face regulatory challenges that limit their mainstream use. The environmental impact of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies varies significantly. While fiat money production consumes physical resources, cryptocurrencies, especially Proof-of-Work (PoW) networks like Bitcoin, require high energy consumption for mining. However, newer crypto models are becoming more eco-friendly. The production and circulation of fiat currencies involve printing banknotes, minting coins, and running financial infrastructure. For instance, the U.S. Federal Reserve prints over $700 billion in new banknotes annually, requiring vast amounts of paper and ink. While this has an environmental impact, it is relatively low compared to energy-intensive crypto mining. On the other hand, cryptocurrency mining, particularly Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains, consumes vast amounts of energy due to computational mining processes. However, newer models are reducing their carbon footprint. For instance, Bitcoin’s annual energy consumption is estimated at 86 TWh, which is comparable to Argentina’s entire electricity usage. However, more than 50% of Bitcoin mining is powered by renewable energy. Both fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies are undergoing significant transformations due to technological advancements, regulatory shifts, and changing global economic conditions. Governments and central banks are adapting to digital innovation by modernizing fiat currency infrastructure and exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Related: Swiss National Bank: Crypto Not Ready for Prime Time, CBDC Is Key Crypto markets have seen major innovations in blockchain scalability, regulation, and institutional adoption, which have driven mainstream interest and investment. The debate between government currencies and cryptocurrencies is not limited to technology but also concerns the future of money itself. Government currencies have long been the foundation of global economies, offering stability, government backing, and universal acceptance. However, they are susceptible to inflation, central control, and economic manipulation. Conversely, cryptocurrencies represent a decentralized, transparent, and borderless alternative that empowers individuals to control their wealth without intermediaries. Yet, their volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and security risks remain significant challenges to mass adoption. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

The operation of AB (AB) is based on its integrated network launch. 1. AB Mainnet AB Mainnet is the core infrastructure of the ecosystem, ensuring fast and secure transactions, efficient support for smart contract deployment, and decentralized governance with high processing power and low latency – creating a solid foundation for both developers and users. 2. High-Performance Sidechains AB introduces specialized sidechains designed for each industry such as payments, gaming, and finance. These sidechains not only reduce the load on the mainnet but also provide optimal functions for each use case, thereby improving the scalability and operational efficiency of the entire system. 3. Blockchain Interoperability By applying advanced cross-chain technology, AB enables seamless information exchange and asset transfer between different blockchain networks. This promotes cooperation and connectivity between ecosystems, overcoming the limitations of individual platforms. 4. Real World Assets (RWA) AB facilitates the digitization and management of real assets by converting them into tokens on the blockchain. This feature opens up opportunities for transparent, efficient, and secure asset trading, while bridging traditional industries and the decentralized finance sector. By integrating vibrant community engagement and strong partnerships, AB (AB) aims to become a sustainable and influential project within the crypto ecosystem.$AB

$AB represents a groundbreaking evolution in blockchain technology, building upon the foundation established by the Newton Project, which launched in 2018. The Newton Project’s vision was to create infrastructure for the Community Economy, empowering individuals with the principle that "everyone should benefit directly from economic growth." Over the years, this vision has been partially realized through the development of decentralized infrastructure supporting community-driven economies. With the first phase of this journey now complete, the project embarks on a new chapter of innovation and expansion. In 2025, the Newton Project rebranded as AB, signaling a strategic shift toward a more advanced blockchain ecosystem. AB focuses on heterogeneous blockchain infrastructure, real-world asset integration, and optimized tokenomics. At its core lies the AB token, the native cryptocurrency of the AB blockchain, which serves as the Gas token for powering transactions, executing smart contracts, and enabling governance mechanisms. This ensures the network's scalability, reliability, and sustainability.

The AB Coin ecosystem is a comprehensive network that supports various applications and services. At its core is the $AB token, which serves multiple purposes, including: - Gas Token: $AB is used to pay for transaction fees on the AB mainnet. - Smart Contract Execution: $AB powers the execution of smart contracts on the AB platform. - Governance Voting: Holders of $AB can participate in governance voting, influencing the direction of the AB ecosystem. - Ecosystem Incentives: $AB is used to incentivize participants in the AB ecosystem, promoting growth and adoption. The AB ecosystem is built on a high-performance mainchain + sidechain architecture, enabling seamless interactions between different blockchain networks ¹. This architecture supports: - Cross-Chain Asset Transfers: Users can transfer assets between different blockchain networks. - Decentralized Applications (DApps): Developers can build complex DApps on the AB platform. In terms of tokenomics, the total supply of $AB is capped at 100 billion tokens. The token distribution plan includes: - Presale: 20% of the total supply (10 billion tokens) is reserved for presale. - Community: 70% of the total supply (35 billion tokens) is allocated to the community, including miners, community building, and ecosystem development. The AB ecosystem also implements a *dynamic burn mechanism, where a portion of transaction fees and ecosystem payments are periodically burned, reducing the total supply and creating a deflationary effect .$AB