Prezzo di cVault.financeCORE

n the fast-moving world of crypto and Web3, new financial products are launching every week—but few are as groundbreaking as the PENGU ETF. This isn’t your typical crypto fund or NFT-themed ETF that plays it safe. No, this is a bold attempt to package real NFTs inside a regulated exchange-traded fund, something that’s never been done before. Let’s break down what the PENGU ETF is, why it matters, and whether it has the potential to reshape how we invest in digital collectibles. The introduction of the PENGU ETF marks a turning point in how investors and regulators perceive the value of digital collectibles. Its success hinges not only on regulatory approval but also on market acceptance. If institutional and retail investors embrace the fund, it could validate NFTs as a legitimate asset class within traditional portfolios. The ETF structure also solves major pain points around custody, valuation, and liquidity that have long plagued the NFT market. By wrapping NFTs in a regulated product, Canary Capital may create a blueprint that other firms can replicate, opening the door for a wave of new ETF filings backed by digital art, metaverse assets, or tokenized intellectual property. For early investors, potential ROI could be significant if PENGU NFTs surge in value or if the ETF attracts institutional capital—but this is contingent on the ETF’s ability to scale and maintain liquidity in a volatile NFT market. Looking ahead, if the PENGU ETF gains traction post-approval, we could see a ripple effect throughout both traditional and decentralized finance sectors. Financial institutions may begin exploring hybrid portfolios containing NFTs, fungible tokens, and RWAs (real-world assets), ultimately pushing more on-chain assets into mainstream trading platforms. Furthermore, success could encourage blue-chip NFT projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club or CryptoPunks to structure similar funds, fueling demand for oracle-driven NFT pricing solutions and regulated custody platforms. However, risk factors remain high: the illiquid nature of NFTs, challenges in accurate valuation, and regulatory hurdles may lead to price discrepancies, redemption issues, or underperformance compared to traditional ETFs. In the long term, PENGU ETF could be remembered not just as a novelty but as a foundational shift in how we invest in culture, community, and digital ownership—provided it can navigate the complex balance of innovation and compliance. At its core, the PENGU ETF is an exchange-traded fund that holds two key assets: Unlike traditional NFT-themed ETFs that only hold stocks of NFT-related companies or market-tracking tokens, the PENGU ETF directly integrates real, on-chain assets. This makes it the first ETF to cross over from simply referencing NFTs to actually owning them. The fund is spearheaded by Canary Capital, a digital asset investment firm known for taking crypto and NFT products into regulated finance. With PENGU ETF, their goal is clear: become the first to embed actual NFTs inside an ETF structure, offering traditional investors exposure to Web3 assets without the hassle of wallets, gas fees, or private key management. The fund’s structure is unique—and carefully engineered: This hybrid model gives the fund a dual advantage—exposure to a native token with active utility and community traction, plus direct ownership of high-profile NFTs with potential long-term value. NFT ETFs aren’t new—but most don’t actually hold NFTs. Instead, they track companies like Coinbase or marketplaces like OpenSea, or hold tokens that represent the NFT market in a broad sense. The PENGU ETF flips the script, offering: Still, not everyone’s convinced. Skeptics argue there may not be enough demand for an NFT-backed ETF. But believers point out: a regulated product adds trust and transparency to a space often plagued by scams and volatility. Since this is a first-of-its-kind fund, its mechanics are speculative—but here’s a likely setup: Investors wouldn’t be buying NFTs directly. Instead, they’d own shares in the ETF, which represent fractional ownership of the fund’s combined PENGU token and NFT holdings. While the filing is exciting, regulatory approval is far from guaranteed. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has never approved an ETF that holds NFTs directly. The challenges are clear: That said, the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2024 marked a major shift in regulatory openness. If Canary Capital can provide a robust framework for valuation, liquidity, and compliance, PENGU ETF might just stand a chance. To understand the PENGU ETF's innovation, it helps to compare it to traditional art investment funds like: These firms offer exposure to famous artworks (think Banksy, Picasso), but they’re slow, illiquid, and often inaccessible to smaller investors. Selling a stake in an art fund can take months or even years. By contrast, the PENGU ETF brings digital art into the liquid, accessible world of public markets. ETF shares can be traded easily, while NFTs are securely stored on-chain. Whether or not the PENGU ETF gets the green light, it’s clear this is just the beginning. We’re likely entering an era where NFT-backed ETFs and tokenized asset funds become a regular feature of the investing world. If PENGU succeeds, we might see: Canary Capital might be the first, but they won’t be the last. The PENGU ETF is more than a finance experiment—it’s a bold move to redefine how we think about NFTs as investable assets. If it works, it could bridge the chasm between Web3 and Wall Street. If it fails, it’ll still be remembered as a trailblazer. One thing is for sure: NFTs are growing up, and the financial world is starting to pay attention.

In a major development, Meltem Demirors, Chief Strategy Officer of CoinShares, stated that Ethereum’s pivot to Proof of Stake (PoS) in 2022 was costly. In 2022, the Ethereum conversion to PoS dramatically reduced energy consumption by over 99%. Notably, ETH’s consistent market volatility raises issues about its long-term impact on the network’s value and stability. According to Meltem Demirors, PoS weakened the Ethereum core network by enabling the rapid expansion of Layer-2 scaling solutions. According to her, these L2s now process a significant share of transactions. She believes the network lost a $1 trillion growth opportunity by abandoning Proof of Work (PoW). This has ultimately diluted the Ethereum Layer-1 ecosystem instead of strengthening it. For her, had ETH stayed on PoW, it could have created a solid energy-computation infrastructure that would make it rival Bitcoin side-by-side. She pointed out that it could have also allowed for strategic innovation in GPU computing, similar to Bitcoin mining advanced hardware development. Similarly, Ethereum’s economic viability is drawing mixed market reactions. When developers introduced PoS, Ethereum came off as ultra-sound money. This positioning is due to mechanisms like EIP-1559, which burns a portion of transaction fees. ETH achieved near-zero net issuance for a time, reinforcing its deflationary narrative. However, data from Ultrasound Money now shows that Ethereum is in its longest inflationary period since The Merge. The network currently issues 943,000 ETH annually while burning just 27,000 ETH. At an annual inflation rate of 0.76%, Ethereum’s earlier deflationary claims are being challenged. CryptoQuant analysts caution that Ethereum may never become deflationary again without significantly higher network activity. Notably, this has weakened its long-term store-of-value argument. As we mentioned in our earlier news brief, Justin Drake posited that through the much-anticipated Pectra Upgrade, Ethereum would have to decrease its issuance or increase its token burn to restore its status as ultrasound money. It is worth mentioning that Ethereum’s broader vision has also come under scrutiny. Peter Szilágyi, a key Ethereum developer, recently stated that ETH was never designed to be money. Instead, it was meant to power a decentralized ecosystem. This contradicts narratives that positioned ETH as a superior alternative to Bitcoin in terms of scarcity and value retention. Critics argue that a lack of clear positioning could affect Ethereum’s long-term appeal. Despite these concerns, some industry leaders see benefits in PoS. Vince Yang, CEO of zkLink, pointed out that Ethereum’s scaling activity is at an all-time high, with transaction speeds doubling in recent months due to lower gas fees. One avenue to enhance Ethereum’s functionality is the Pectra upgrade. As we covered in our latest report, the Ethereum Pectra upgrade went live on the Sepolia testnet but encountered errors exacerbated by an attacker’s activities. However, Ethereum developers have introduced the ‘Hoodi’ testnet to further refine Pectra’s innovations. All the arguments have weighed down ETH’s price outlook thus far. As of this writing, ETH is trading at $1,967.42, down over 1.4% in the past 24 hours.

$PI As of March 22, 2025, Pi Network's native cryptocurrency, PI, is trading around $0.99, reflecting a slight decrease of approximately 0.057% from the previous close. Pi Network (PI) $1.00 -$0.06 (-5.71%) Today 1D-1M 5D-6M max Recently, PI experienced a significant decline, dropping over 43% in the past week and falling below the critical $1 support level, currently trading around $0.90. This downturn has raised concerns among investors about the coin's stability and future performance. Brave New Coin +1 Coinfomania +1 The negative sentiment surrounding Pi Network has been exacerbated by accusations from critics labeling the project a potential "scam," further dampening investor confidence. Brave New Coin +2 BeInCrypto +2 Coinfomania +2 Technical indicators, such as the BBTrend, are currently at -40.69, marking their lowest reading on record and remaining negative for the past five days. This suggests sustained bearish momentum and raises concerns about further price declines. CoinGape +2 BeInCrypto +2 Brave New Coin +2 Given these developments, PI's ability to maintain support above $0.60 is uncertain. The project's future largely depends on the Pi Core Team's efforts to restore investor confidence by providing a clear roadmap for its Open Mainnet launch and addressing concerns about exchange listings. Failure to do so could lead to further price declines. CryptoPotato +5 Brave New Coin +5 BeInCrypto +5

Bitcoin $BTC has hit a remarkable milestone. With a market capitalization of $1.7 trillion, it now accounts for 1.3% of the global money supply. For a decentralized digital asset that started as an experiment just over 15 years ago, this is a staggering achievement and a clear signal that we’re still in the early innings of its potential. The Numbers Tell the Story The global money supply, encompassing cash, bank deposits, and other liquid instruments (often measured as M2), is estimated to hover around $130 trillion. Bitcoin’s $1.7 trillion market cap might seem like a drop in the bucket by comparison, but that’s exactly why the bullish case is so compelling. At just 1.3%, Bitcoin has already outpaced the market value of many national currencies and established itself as a legitimate player in the financial world all without a central bank, government backing, or physical form. Consider this: if Bitcoin were a country, its "economy" would rank among the top 20 globally by GDP. Yet, unlike traditional economies, Bitcoin’s growth isn’t constrained by geography, politics, or resource scarcity. Its fixed supply of 21 million coins and decentralized nature make it a unique asset, one that’s increasingly catching the eye of investors, institutions, and even skeptics turning into believers. Why This Matters Reaching 1.3% of global money isn’t just a fun statistic it’s a testament to Bitcoin’s staying power and adoption. The asset has weathered brutal bear markets, regulatory uncertainty, and endless FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) to emerge stronger each cycle. This resilience is drawing in a wave of new participants, from retail hodlers to Wall Street giants. Institutional adoption is accelerating. Companies like MicroStrategy have made Bitcoin a core treasury asset, while ETFs in the U.S. and beyond have opened the floodgates for traditional investors. Meanwhile, nations like El Salvador have embraced it as legal tender, and others are quietly exploring similar moves. The network effect is kicking in: the more people use Bitcoin, the more valuable and entrenched it becomes. We’re Still Early Really Early If 1.3% sounds impressive, here’s the kicker: there’s still so much room to grow. Imagine Bitcoin capturing 5% of global money supply that’s a $6.5 trillion market cap at current estimates. Push it to 10%, and we’re talking $13 trillion, nearly rivaling gold’s total market value. These aren’t pie-in-the-sky projections; they’re plausible scenarios given Bitcoin’s trajectory and the cracks forming in traditional financial systems. Inflation, currency devaluation, and distrust in centralized institutions are tailwinds propelling Bitcoin forward. Fiat currencies are losing purchasing power look at the U.S. dollar’s 20%+ decline in real value over the past decade. Bitcoin, with its capped supply, offers a hedge that’s hard to ignore. And with only about 5-10% of the world’s population owning crypto, according to most estimates, the adoption curve is barely starting to steepen. The Bullish Case in One Word: Scarcity Bitcoin’s killer feature is its scarcity. Only 21 million BTC will ever exist, and with millions already lost to forgotten wallets or hodlers who won’t sell, the effective circulating supply is even smaller. Compare that to fiat, where central banks can print trillions at will (see: $6 trillion in COVID era stimulus). As demand rises and it is rising Bitcoin’s price could see exponential gains. At $1.7 trillion, Bitcoin is no longer a niche experiment; it’s a global force. Yet, at 1.3% of the money supply, it’s nowhere near saturation. The next decade could see it challenge gold, bonds, or even equities as a store of value. Early adopters aren’t just sitting on gains they’re positioned for a paradigm shift.

Pi Network's PI Coin has fallen below the critical $1 support level, sparking concerns about its viability. Reasons for PI Coin's Struggles 1. *Lack of Decentralization*: Pi Network requires Know Your Customer (KYC) verification for transactions, contradicting its claim of being a decentralized blockchain project. 2. *Centralized Technology*: The project's core technology is built on existing frameworks rather than innovative solutions. 3. *Referral-Based System*: The system has been likened to a multi-level marketing scheme, raising questions about its sustainability. 4. *Exchange Listing Uncertainty*: Major exchanges are hesitant to list PI Coin, fueling uncertainty. 5. *Mainnet Delay*: Pi Network has been operational for years without a fully functional mainnet, leading some to label it a scam. The combination of these factors has led to growing skepticism and a decline in PI Coin's value. Its future remains uncertain, with many questioning whether it can reclaim its previous highs.