Ondoの‌価格ONDO

The crypto market shows tentative signs of early momentum, prompting investors to look closely at altcoins for potential outsized gains compared to Bitcoin. While Bitcoin often directs the market, tokens including SUI, APT, LINK, HBAR, DOT, NEAR, ICP, ONDO, RENDER, CRO, and FIL are drawing fresh attention relative to their previous performance peaks. Sui (SUI) is currently trading at $2.68, registering a 6.30% daily and 10.59% weekly increase. Its rapid growth, high liquidity, and market cap exceeding $8.5 billion could position it for significant moves if broader bullish conditions solidify. Aptos (APT) follows closely, priced at $6.01 , gaining 1.50% in 24 hours and 9.17% over the week. APT’s strong technical foundation and comparatively smaller token supply remain arguments used by analysts for potential sharp gains. Chainlink (LINK) trades at $15.66 , slightly dipping by 0.43% daily but still up 6.67% weekly. As a critical provider of oracle infrastructure essential for DeFi protocols, LINK’s relative stability could fuel a significant rally if the DeFi sector sees a strong rebound. Related: Altcoins Gaining Ground: XRP, SUI, and Ondo Lead the Market Recovery Hedera (HBAR), on the other hand, sits near $0.1947 , down 1.00% but roughly flat over the past week (+0.42%). HBAR’s focus on real-world enterprise partnerships offers a unique angle, although its large token supply might temper expectations of rapid price surges compared to lower-supply assets. Polkadot (DOT) stands at $4.70 , climbing 0.78% today and 5.47% this week. Its multichain ecosystem is growing steadily, but it needs more adoption to reclaim its highs. NEAR Protocol (NEAR), priced at $3.02 , saw a 10.84% weekly jump despite a 0.99% dip today. NEAR’s developer-friendly tools may give it a long-term advantage. Internet Computer (ICP), around $6.11 , added 3.93% weekly despite a 2.55% daily drop. Though sometimes debated, its unique blockchain-based web-hosting model remains a point of interest for potential new capital inflows during market upswings. Ondo (ONDO) is trading at $0.9216 , with a 5.63% weekly rise despite a 1.70% decline today. Its focus on the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization narrative attracts increasing investor attention. Render (RENDER) continues to shine at $3.97 , up an impressive 18.12% weekly even with a 4.23% daily dip, driven by its distinct AI and GPU rendering niche. Related: Crypto’s Odd Rally: SUI, SOL, LINK, ONDO, LTC, HBAR, AAVE, and ADA Surge Despite Bitcoin’s Dip Cronos (CRO) climbed a notable 23.21% weekly to trade near $0.1005 , demonstrating resilience often linked to the Crypto.com exchange ecosystem despite a 5.58% daily drop. Filecoin (FIL), at $3.06 , was quieter this week (+1.70% weekly, -3.30% daily), but its established decentralized storage solution keeps it relevant for long-term market watchers. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

TODAY'S PRIME FOCUS: The future targets for⬇️ 🔮 $ONDO | Ondo | @OndoFinance For information only—Not investment advice. DYOR❗️ Find out the anticipated target for $ONDO in 2025 according to our analysts.👇

🇺🇸Top 5 American Cryptos to Watch! 💰$XRP flexing after beating the SEC, aiming for $3.40! Big banks still backing it. ⚡Solana, the so-called “Ethereum killer,” hovers around $138. If it flips $150, next stop: $180+! 🏦Ondo Finance tokenizing US bonds, makin’ TradFi & DeFi besties. Could hit $2.10 if momentum stays lit. 🦄Uniswap remains the DEX king, but SEC watchin’. Fee switch activation = moon potential? 👀$TRUMP memecoin pumped 782%, crashed 85%, now chilling at $11. But politics look like they can pump it again! $TRUMP $XRP $SOL

The Hook: A Promise Too Good to Be True In early 2025, Sarah, a 32-year-old graphic designer from Seattle, was casually scrolling through X (formerly Twitter) when a post caught her eye. The user @CryptoWealthGuru was raving about a new decentralized finance (DeFi) platform called YieldPhantom, which promised 25% monthly returns through a so-called “revolutionary liquidity mining algorithm.” The page looked legit—thousands of followers, a verified badge (or so it seemed), and a sleek website filled with glowing testimonials from “investors” who claimed it had changed their lives. The excitement was contagious. “This could be my ticket to financial freedom,” Sarah thought. But what she didn’t know was that she was about to be scammed out of $13,700. The Bait: A Flawless Illusion As Sarah clicked through the YieldPhantom website, everything seemed perfect. The interface was polished, the testimonials looked authentic, and even the “audit report” linked to a document featuring a well-known blockchain security firm’s logo. A pop-up chat appeared, introducing her to "Mike," a friendly support agent who claimed to be a former Wall Street trader turned DeFi expert. “Early investors are already cashing out huge profits,” Mike assured her. “You’re lucky to have found us before we go viral.” Skeptical but intrigued, Sarah decided to test it out. She connected her MetaMask wallet and deposited 0.5 ETH (worth about $1,200 at the time). Within hours, her dashboard showed a 5% gain—a neat extra $60. Encouraged by the seemingly instant profit, Sarah decided to go all in. She transferred her entire crypto savings—5 ETH ($12,000). For a week, her balance kept growing, reaching $15,000. Excited, she shared the platform with her X followers, hoping they could benefit too. Then, she tried to withdraw her profits. The Trap: Vanishing Wealth The withdrawal button worked—at first. But before her transaction could go through, a message popped up: “To process your withdrawal, please send a 0.2 ETH ($500) security fee.” Mike reassured her. “Don’t worry, it’s just for network congestion priority. You’ll get it back immediately.” Hesitant but eager to cash out, Sarah sent the extra ETH. But her funds never arrived. Instead, the site froze her withdrawal request. A day later, the website disappeared. @CryptoWealthGuru was deleted. Her wallet was empty. Sarah had just been scammed out of $13,700. The Investigation: Exposing the Scam Determined to understand what had happened, Sarah turned to a crypto recovery forum. That’s where she met Alex, a blockchain investigator who had seen similar scams before. He started digging. The Fake Setup Alex traced the YieldPhantom website’s domain—it had been registered just two months earlier through a privacy-protected service in Panama. The “audit report” was a forged PDF using a real security firm’s logo, but the firm’s official website had no record of YieldPhantom. The Social Media Deception Alex used archived X posts to uncover @CryptoWealthGuru’s history. It had started as a small account posting generic crypto tips. Then, suddenly, it pivoted—promoting YieldPhantom daily. Its engagement skyrocketed—likely boosted by fake followers and bot comments. Even the “verified badge” was a trick. The scammers used a Unicode symbol that mimicked X’s checkmark, making them look official. The Blockchain Clues Sarah’s MetaMask transactions told the real story. Her ETH had been sent to a scammer-controlled wallet, which had received funds from hundreds of other victims. Alex checked Etherscan and saw that the scammer’s wallet had collected over 200 ETH ($480,000). The smart contract blocked withdrawals unless a “fee” was paid, but it was rigged—no one ever got their funds back. When the scammers were satisfied, they drained the entire pool and abandoned the platform. The Tactics: How Crypto Scammers Operate Sarah’s case is just one example of how crypto scams work. Here are the common tactics they use: Fake DeFi Platforms: Scammers create professional-looking websites with fake dashboards showing false profits to trick users into depositing more money. Social Media Manipulation: They exploit X (Twitter), Telegram, and Reddit using bots, fake testimonials, and stolen credibility to appear trustworthy. Urgency & Trust Traps: They use fake "support agents" like "Mike" to build trust and pressure victims into investing quickly. Fake Withdrawal Fees: They make victims pay more to withdraw their own money, then disappear. Blockchain’s Irreversibility: Once funds are sent to a scammer’s wallet, they’re gone—unless traced and frozen (which is rare). How to Protect Yourself From Crypto Scams Sarah’s loss is a painful reminder of the risks in crypto. Here’s how to stay safe: ✅ Verify Everything Check domain registration age (use WHOIS lookup) and confirm audits on official security firm websites. Search project names on X or Google with “scam” to see if others have reported issues. ✅ Secure Your Wallet Never share your private keys or seed phrases. Use a hardware wallet (Ledger, Trezor) for large sums to keep them offline. ✅ Test with a Small Amount First If trying a new platform, send a tiny amount (e.g., 0.01 ETH) to test withdrawals before committing more. ✅ Beware of Hype & Fake Returns If someone promises guaranteed high returns (e.g., 25% monthly), it’s a scam. On X, check account engagement history. If it suddenly shifted from generic posts to promotions, be suspicious. ✅ Avoid Pressure & FOMO Traps Scammers push urgency (“Limited spots left!”) to bypass your skepticism. Take your time to research—real opportunities don’t disappear overnight. ✅ Report & Warn Others If scammed, report to the FBI’s IC3 (ic3.gov) with transaction details. Share your experience on X, forums, and Reddit to alert the community. The Aftermath: Turning a Loss Into a Lesson Sarah never recovered her funds. The scammers laundered the ETH through mixing services, making it untraceable. But instead of staying silent, she shared her story on X. Her thread reached over 10,000 people, warning them about similar scams. Alex’s investigation inspired a crypto meetup in Seattle to host a “Scam Awareness Night,” where dozens learned how to spot fraud. Her loss saved others from making the same mistake. The crypto world is full of opportunities—but also traps. If something looks too good to be true, it probably is. $BEAM $BEAM $FORM $MAVIA $BEAM $BTC $ETH $TON $SOL $SUI $GODS $CEC $ILV $CARV $LTC $MAK $CEEK $ARB $XAI $ONDO $DOGE $GAME

A recent analysis of ten cryptocurrency tokens launched in 2024 reveals dramatic shifts in their Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV), according to data from Tokenomists. FDV, which represents a token’s total potential market cap based on its maximum supply, fluctuated significantly depending on supply dynamics and demand. As per Tokenomists data, Hyperliquid ($HYPE), Ondo ($ONDO), and Celestia ($TIA) outperformed the rest with notable FDV increases. $HYPE’s FDV soared from $6.5 billion to $15.9 billion, a 2.4x increase. This rise occurred despite a slight drop in circulating supply from 370 million to 333 million tokens, suggesting controlled supply management or token buybacks. The price gained 145%, while market cap rose 120%, underscoring demand strength. However, with 11.88% of supply set to unlock within a year, the market’s ability to absorb this liquidity remains crucial. $ONDO recorded an even more striking 3.7x FDV surge to $8.2 billion. While its circulating supply more than doubled, a significant price gain indicated demand was outpacing the increased supply. Related: TRUMP Meme Coin Hits $75B FDV as CZ Shuts Down Meme Coin Speculation Celestia ($TIA) also saw a healthy 70% FDV increase to $3.9 billion, supported by steady price growth. Nevertheless, a significant cliff unlock in 2025, accounting for 61.40% of supply, could test future liquidity. Meanwhile, $TIA increased its FDV by 70% to $3.9 billion, supported by a steady 52% price gain and manageable unlocks. Tokens like Dymension ($DYM), Wormhole ($W), StarkNet ($STRK), and XAI ($XAI) suffered massive FDV declines. $DYM’s FDV plunged 92% from $4.7 billion to $364 million, driven by a rapid 77% increase in circulating supply and collapsing demand. A similar trend emerged with $W, whose FDV dropped 92% due to large cliff and linear unlocks that flooded the market with excess tokens. Related: AI Tokens: Low Float, High FDV Drives Market Dominance $STRK and $XAI saw their FDVs shrink by 91% and 89%, respectively, as rapid supply growth outpaced demand. $STRK’s circulating supply surged 298%, causing prices to tank 92%. Additionally, cliff unlocks accounting for over half the supply intensified the sell pressure. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.