Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesCopyBotsEarn

Current status of VC in the cryptocurrency circle: VCs who “assemble” the market and “big investors” who take over

BlockBeats2024/07/05 06:04
By:BlockBeats
Original title: "The locked "paper wealth", VCs encountering the "hell difficulty" cycle"
Original author: Mia, ChainCatcher


Retail investors attribute the reason for losing money to the "high FDV (future discounted value), low circulation" token issuance strategy, believing that VCs and project parties conspired to unlock a large number of tokens, which impacted the crypto market.


VCs "crying out for injustice", defining the primary market of this cycle as "hell difficulty". LD Capital partner Li Xi said that this year's books are profitable, but all are paper values, because the shares belonging to VCs are still 0 unlocked. Except for the VCs who "assembled the game", most VCs are "big leeks" who took over.


ChainCatcher interviewed several representatives of the VC industry, trying to explore the current survival status of VCs.


Many VCs said that 6 major reasons have led to the current VC exit difficulties. Some VCs said that in the current market environment, not investing has become the best strategy.


VC's "paper wealth"


In the current market cycle, the "high FDV, low circulation" token issuance method has gradually become a mainstream trend, and "VC tokens" have been labeled "dangerous" in the secondary market.


Previously, hitesh.eth, the co-founder of the data analysis platform DYOR, posted a set of data on X, counting the top ten typical "VC tokens" on the market.



The data shows that even in the case of a continuous decline in the market, the major VCs still have a floating profit of dozens or even nearly a hundred times the book value of their investments in these tokens.


For VC institutions, "book profit" has always been common sense and objective. Early investors usually receive a certain proportion of tokens as rewards, and these tokens will be locked according to a specific time limit structure. This phenomenon has always existed regardless of web2 or web3 investment, but the proportion will be very different in different development stages.


However, the uncertainty of unlocking also makes this part of the income become "paper wealth".


LD Capital partner Li Xi publicly stated that although the projects invested by LD Capital and launched on the trading platform have shown a profitable trend in the financial statements, behind this series of seemingly glamorous figures is actually "paper wealth", "because the VC's "high FDV, low circulation" leads to 0 unlocking of tokens."


For retail investors in the secondary market, a large number of VC shares have not been unlocked, which has caused new panic.


Common token lock-up parameters include: allocation ratio, lock-up time and unlocking period. All these parameters only play a role in the time dimension. At present, the unlocking period is a one-size-fits-all rule set by the project party and the exchange. For the current market environment, "unlocked tokens" have become VC "book profits".


Faced with "book profits", the market has also begun to develop a countermeasure - "over-the-counter OTC".


CatcherVC investment partner Loners said: "If the deal you invest in is not bad, there will be some funds willing to buy the saft agreement in your hand, which is equivalent to risk transfer or early cashing out, but the current trading volume in the OTC market is still too small, and the trading is concentrated in a few particularly top projects."


Loners said that if OTC trading gradually matures and matches funds with different risk tolerances, this problem will be partially alleviated. Or more extreme options can also choose the form of short hedging, but many institutions do not have management experience in this area and are not recommended to try.


Lock-up dilemma


Faced with the unlocking of a large number of "VC tokens" in the current market, unless market demand increases, it may bring potential selling pressure.


Loners also holds the same view: "The unlocking period of project tokens and related resources is relatively long. If the market's expectations for project development are not met during this period, coupled with market sentiment and liquidity fluctuations, and the high premium caused by the peak of project popularity usually concentrated in the listing stage, the price of tokens is prone to fall if there is a lack of new funds injected after the project is unlocked."


Hack VC partner Ro Patel said, "If the proportion of locked tokens is too large, it will affect the available liquidity of the tokens, which will have an adverse impact on the price of the tokens, and thus harm the interests of all holders; conversely, if contributors are not properly compensated, they may lose the motivation to continue building, which will eventually harm the interests of all holders."


Similarly, SevenUpDao partner Nathan believes that "for some underlying infrastructure, the unlocking can remain unchanged, giving them time to develop across cycles. But for projects on the traffic side and application side, the same unlocking should not be adopted. You need to encourage and motivate them to unlock quickly to continuously innovate the next one."


Loners also holds the same view as Nathan, believing that the design of unlocking terms should be based on the specific project type. "For important infrastructure in the industry, longer-term unlocking can be accepted, while many application projects should not design particularly strict terms. Instead, they should focus on the product itself and exchange relatively good unlocking conditions for financing efficiency."


6 major reasons for the difficulty of the primary market


As market liquidity dries up, the return cycle of the primary market is extended, and more and more small and medium-sized VCs affiliated with large VCs have chosen a conservative wait-and-see attitude.


Nathan confessed, "For small and medium-sized investment institutions, the higher the flexibility of adjustment, the less likely they are to suffer losses in this matter, because you don't need to invest in 30 or 50 projects a year for the sake of brand and to spend LP's money at a rhythm, and there are not so many high-quality projects in the market for everyone to share."


Some small and medium-sized VC institutions also said that due to overvaluation and strict investment terms, they did not participate in too many primary investments this year.


They believe that some new projects on the market are not backed by large VCs and the concepts are not innovative enough. In addition, too high FDV may also make the price of TGE exceed expectations. "Many institutional investments are actually facing losses."


As more and more small VCs withdraw, the market has become a battlefield for large VCs to "fight alone."


Due to the pressure of LPs to contribute funds, large VCs still need to invest despite the difficult investment environment.


Facing the current difficulty of investing in the primary market, Nathan optimistically defines it as "temporary and a reasonable existence of phased development."


VCs believe that the challenges of this round of investment "hell difficulty" mainly come from the following 6 aspects:


· Valuation bubble and market turbulence:In early 2022, affected by the dollar's water dividend, North American VC institutions successfully raised huge funds, pushing the valuation of the primary market to an irrational level. Subsequently, events such as FTX's thunderbolt and Binance CZ occurred one after another, seriously disrupting the market's financing and listing rhythm, further exacerbating market uncertainty.


· Lack of industry narratives and applications:Although technical narratives and new asset issuance narratives emerge in an endless stream, the market generally lacks application narratives that can attract users and generate practical utility. This leads investors to be skeptical about the long-term value of the project, which in turn affects their investment decisions.


· Limited capital flow and stock market: The market as a whole is in a stock capital state, and capital flow is limited. Although there is ETF inflow, it does not flow into the copycat market, which directly affects the market activity and the financing ability of the project.


· The dilemma of altcoins and VC coins: The price of altcoins has fallen sharply, and VC coins are facing the dilemma of unlocking a large amount of funds but no incremental funds to take over, which has led to the continuous decline of these currencies, further undermining market confidence.


· Concentration of funds and difficulty in exiting: The funds are highly concentrated in a few top CEXs, while most non-popular projects cannot meet the listing requirements of CEXs and are difficult to gain the favor of investment institutions, which in turn increases the difficulty of project exit.


· Lack of hot spots and shift of hot money: The current market lacks new hot spots to carry hot money. At the same time, when the market's attention is focused on riskier memes, it further exacerbates the market's speculative atmosphere and volatility.


VCs that “assemble” and “big leeks” that take over


LD Capital partner Li Xi summarized the current VC situation by saying, “Except for VCs that “assemble”, most VCs are “big leeks” that take over, and this is indeed the case. Nathan defines it as “‘assemble’ is a market adjustment phenomenon under the current primary market exit difficulty.”


Against the backdrop of the increasing difficulty of primary market exit, “assemble” has quietly emerged. “Assembly” reduces the risk of VCs losing money to a relatively controllable range with a lower valuation in the form of “grouping”.


However, “assembly” is not without flaws. There are few excellent founding teams, narrative homogeneity is serious, trial and error costs are high, and there is a lack of direct capital exit channels. These are all challenges that cannot be ignored.


Nathan said, "When the primary market is particularly prosperous, direct investment is more efficient in terms of ROI; otherwise, 'assembling a game' will be considered." For VCs that hope to develop steadily in the long term, "the action of 'assembling a game' is not necessary, but the ability to 'assembly a game' is necessary."


Regarding the "assembly a game" project and "big leeks", it is actually a process of market selection and self-healing. Loners said that whether it is an assembly project or a serious project, from a financial perspective, the exit often depends on the performance of the secondary market. However, the core of the project still lies in whether its products or services can create positive value for the industry. If a project lacks substantial contribution, it will be difficult to maintain its market position for a long time even with a strong background and support.


Nathan said that if a large number of "assembly a game" projects are of poor quality, capital cannot exit, and are swept up by public opinion, then naturally the "assembly a game" will lose motivation." If this project can obtain better resources and the valuation is reasonable, why not do it?


Original link


欢迎加入律动 BlockBeats 官方社群:

Telegram 订阅群: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram 交流群: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Twitter 官方账号: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

You may also like

IREN Shares Plunge 24% on Nasdaq Following ‘Wildly Overvalued’ Criticism

The report accused IREN of being “wildly overvalued” and lacking sufficient investment to stay competitive in the AI industry.

Cryptopotato2024/07/12 17:16

Football management game Soccerverse completes seed round extension financing, led by well-known game publisher Square Enix, and the total financing

Odaily2024/07/12 16:54

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban calls on SEC to remove chairman Gary Gensler

Odaily2024/07/12 16:54

The monthly rate of PPI in the United States in June was 0.2%, the expected rate was 0.10%, and the previous rate was -0.20%

Odaily2024/07/12 16:54

‌Spot copy trading

More
AIOnline
AIOnline
insight1000/1000
10048.2%
ROI
Total profit $51245.84
WhaleGo_YouTube
WhaleGo_YouTube
insight500/500
1338.92%
ROI
Total profit $3887.72

Bot copy trading

More
Morgee
Morgee
insight80/150
$17427.36
Total profit
Total subscriber profits $-223.07
GoldenEgg
GoldenEgg
insight149/150
$3416.37
Total profit
Total subscriber profits $-284.87