The leading projects collectively "pressure the palace," and community anger sweeps over the Ethereum Foundation again

Author: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

The world has long suffered from the Ethereum Foundation (EF).

As the community's disappointment with ETH's weak performance in this cycle gradually accumulated and eventually erupted, calls for reforming the EF have grown louder.

In the past few days, the entire Ethereum community has been discussing the EF's leadership structure, personnel composition, operational model, and financial plans. Current EF Executive Director Aya Miyaguchi has faced severe criticism from the community, and Vitalik himself has been compelled to publicly state that "a large-scale reform of the EF leadership structure is underway."

As of this Monday, discussions have deepened further. Founders and executives from several leading Ethereum ecosystem projects have stepped forward to criticize the EF for its numerous faults, indicating that major projects have long harbored grievances regarding Ethereum's performance.

Below is a collection of viewpoints compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

Synthetix, Infinex Founder: EF Should Require L2 to Use Revenue to Buy Back ETH

Kain Warwick, founder of Synthetix and Infinex, was the first to strike.

On Monday afternoon, Kain posted on X, stating: "If I were to run the EF, I would definitely pressure Layer 2 to use sequencer revenue to burn ETH. Ethereum has a significant advantage in this negotiation…"

Curve Founder: EF Should Immediately Abandon L2 Strategy

Following Kain, Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov also attacked Layer 2, but with more aggressive wording.

On Monday afternoon, Egorov posted on X that the EF's top priority should be to abandon the Layer 2-centric roadmap and instead focus entirely on expanding Layer 1.

In subsequent discussions with community members, Egorov bluntly stated: "Layer 2 is not a moat; it's a Band-Aid."

Aave Founder: 12 Measures to Save EF

In the evening, Aave founder Stani Kulechov posted a lengthy message on X, stating that he had read the EF's annual budget report and believed that the EF needed to undergo thorough reform in 12 areas to achieve better sustainability:

1. Immediately reduce the burn rate from $130 million to $30 million;
2. Reduce the number of employees to 80;
3. Carefully review who can stay. Remove senior positions, consultants, any part-time roles, interns, freeloaders, cockroaches, and parasites;
4. Ban consultants or any conflicts of interest;
5. Ensure that 80% of employees are technical staff;
6. Split all technical teams into small teams of 5, each focusing on specific areas and expertise;
7. The leadership should be a 5-person committee, selected based on performance, with one serving as chair responsible for VB;
8. Part of the non-technical team should focus on financial management (to be done internally);
9. Diversify finances to invest in various long-term sustainable assets (LRSTs), as well as DeFi and non-DeFi projects with good fundamentals and profitability, built on Ethereum;
10. Diversify staking rewards into stablecoins and invest funds into DeFi;
11. Borrow from Aave to manage finances and conduct timed sales when ETH performs better than other assets;
12. Create a sustainable revenue model from transaction or staking fees to fund a reasonable EF budget.

Former Growth Head of Ethena: EF Should Focus on DeFi

The recently resigned former growth head of Ethena, also the former expansion head of Lido, Seraphim, also shared his views on EF reform.

Seraphim mentioned that Ethereum needs two paths for self-rescue: first, the EF should focus on DeFi; second, Consensys, led by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin, should emulate Microstrategy's approach to BTC. If these two points can be achieved, ETH will soon break through $6000.

Wintermute Founder: Potential Death Spiral for Ethereum

Wintermute, a top market-making institution in the industry, while not exclusive to the Ethereum ecosystem, has directly participated in market-making for many Ethereum ecosystem projects, so its statements also have significant implications for Ethereum.

In the evening, founder and CEO Evgeny Gaevoy discussed the potential death spiral for Ethereum.

Evgeny stated that Ethereum's biggest internal contradiction is: the more ETH is used for "gambling," the higher the price of ETH and its security, as more finance-related Dapps run on Ethereum; conversely, if there is no gambling and ETH is only used for transfers on Zazulu, then the price of ETH will be low, and security will also be low. As ETH prices decline, fewer Dapps will believe Ethereum is still secure and will escape to other chains, further lowering ETH prices, which could lead to a significant death spiral.

Therefore, any blockchain must incorporate gambling, speculation, and broader financial applications as part of its product; otherwise, it will be seen as unsafe.

In the Face of Public Outrage, EF Chooses to Sell Again…

Amidst the community's collective condemnation and unresolved anger, the EF unexpectedly chose to take another action.

Around 6:20 PM, the EF's address for small high-frequency ETH sales, 0xd77…1f4, sold another 100 ETH at an average price of $3364.

As a long-time holder of ETH, I find it hard to imagine why the EF would conduct such a "low total value but highly symbolic" operation at such a sensitive time, especially when the community actively suggested that the EF use staking rewards instead of direct sales, a proposal that Vitalik has acknowledged will be further explored.

You read that right; as the top organization in the Ethereum ecosystem architecture, the EF has not even staked the ETH it holds. Vitalik's explanation is that there are concerns about regulatory issues; secondly, the neutrality issue of the EF, as self-staking would force them to take a position on any future contentious hard forks.

Regulatory issues aside, in fact, with the overall relaxation of the regulatory environment, this is gradually becoming a non-issue.

As for the second point, does this explanation really hold water? As Solana closes in, and competition has reached a life-and-death stage, the EF is still "avoiding suspicion" for future hypothetical situations.

Oh, by the way, the EF also seems unconcerned about competition—today, the Ethereum community dug up Aya Miyaguchi's previous statement in an interview: "I am training people to say no to a culture of competition and winning."

Words fail me; I hope the day of true reform comes soon.