SWIFT Is Dying: Here’s Why XRP Is Taking Over

The ongoing debate about whether XRP can replace SWIFT as the backbone of global finance has gained renewed attention within the cryptocurrency community.

Many XRP supporters argue that SWIFT’s traditional financial messaging system is outdated and inefficient, while XRP offers a more advanced, cost-effective, and rapid alternative for cross-border transactions.

A notable figure in the XRP community, All Things XRP, recently declared that the SWIFT system is slowly becoming obsolete. The account presented nine key reasons supporting the argument that XRP and the XRP Ledger (XRPL) will eventually replace SWIFT as the preferred solution for global payments.

Nine Reasons Why XRP Will Replace SWIFT

SWIFT is Outdated and Expensive: One of the primary arguments against SWIFT is that its payment infrastructure is inefficient, costly, and slow. All Things XRP stated that the SWIFT system relies on outdated processes, which often result in high fees and lengthy transaction times. In contrast, XRP and the XRPL are designed for fast and low-cost transactions, making them a more suitable option for modern financial systems.

Inefficiency of SWIFT’s Messaging System: Another key issue with SWIFT is its reliance on a complex network of intermediaries for transaction settlements. All Things XRP compared SWIFT’s messaging system to a “dinosaur,” noting that banks still need to manually settle transactions despite SWIFT’s role in facilitating cross-border payments. XRP eliminates the need for intermediaries by functioning as a decentralized bridge asset, enabling direct and near-instant transfers between different fiat currencies.

Transaction Speed: The speed of transactions is a major factor where XRP significantly outperforms SWIFT. According to All Things XRP, SWIFT transactions can take up to five days to complete, whereas XRP transactions settle within 3 to 5 seconds . The post emphasized that XRP moves value “at the speed of the internet,” making it far superior in efficiency.

Lower Transaction Costs: Transaction fees are another critical point of comparison. The post claimed that SWIFT transactions can cost as much as $50, depending on the banks involved. In contrast, XRP’s transaction fees are negligible, costing around $0.0002. All Things XRP suggested that businesses and financial institutions will transition to XRP for payments due to its significantly lower costs.

Liquidity Advantages: Liquidity is another area where XRP has a clear advantage. All Things XRP described XRP’s liquidity as its “secret weapon” because it helps free up capital that would otherwise be locked in pre-funded accounts under SWIFT’s system. This allows for more efficient transactions and reduced reliance on traditional correspondent banking relationships.

Growing Adoption of XRP and RippleNet: While SWIFT currently dominates global finance with a network of over 11,000 financial institutions , the XRP ecosystem is expanding rapidly. All Things XRP pointed out that RippleNet, Ripple’s global payment network, has already secured over 300 banking partnerships. This indicates that financial institutions are increasingly adopting Ripple’s technology as an alternative to SWIFT.

Regulatory Developments and Legal Clarity: Regulatory uncertainty is a challenge for XRP. However, All Things XRP noted that SWIFT operates under a multi-layered bureaucratic system, which can slow innovation. The post suggested that once the SEC lawsuit against Ripple is resolved, XRP will be in a stronger position to achieve widespread adoption in the financial sector.

Security Risks Associated With SWIFT: Security concerns also contribute to SWIFT’s declining reliability. All Things XRP referenced the 2016 Bangladesh Bank hack, where cybercriminals stole $81 million through vulnerabilities in SWIFT’s centralized infrastructure. In contrast, XRP operates on a decentralized ledger, which reduces the risk of such large-scale attacks and makes the system more secure.

SWIFT’s Upgrades Are Insufficient: While SWIFT has introduced updates such as ISO 20022 and GPI to improve efficiency, All Things XRP dismissed these changes as minor adjustments that fail to address the system’s fundamental issues. According to the post, XRP represents a complete transformation in global payments rather than an incremental improvement.

The discussion over whether XRP will replace SWIFT continues to gain traction, especially as financial institutions explore faster and more cost-effective alternatives.

All Things XRP asserted that XRP’s advantages in speed, cost-efficiency, and liquidity position it as the inevitable successor to SWIFT. If these factors drive adoption as expected, XRP could become the preferred standard for global financial transactions.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.

Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News