ZeroLend narxZERO

Web3 attack vectors are a finite set. With repeated training you can learn all of them (without the future zero-day ones of course). Then you can start learning their combinations. Learn an attack vector a day, then start combining them. You will be an unstoppable auditor🫡

Vibe coding has become a hot topic among start-ups and tech companies as more and more CEOs admit to using it as a way to cut costs and build innovative tools without hiring engineers. What is it and is it a perfect fit for the crypto space? Coined by OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy in February 2025, the term “vibe coding” refers to the method of using AI to generate codes that developers can use to build applications and tools without prior knowledge of coding necessary. In the words of Karpathy in his X post , this approach allows developers to “fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.” In order to vibe code, all the user has to do is describe what kind of code they need in a few sentences and the AI will do the work, providing the user with the full code line that requires no further adjustments or technical understanding. Therefore, people with no knowledge of coding could use AI to build software and apps that they previously could not due to the coding barrier. With how rapidly this trend is spreading, it is no wonder that some builders in the crypto industry have begun to contemplate its use in the space. In fact, companies like aelf Ventures and Y Combinator have been exploring vibe coding as a way to empower new blockchain projects. Considering how much the crypto and web3 industry values fast-paced development and welcomes new innovations and tools, vibe coding could fill the need for rapid creation and become an entry point for potential crypto industry players with no coding knowledge. Is vibe coding really a perfect fit for the crypto industry? Some traders have highlighted the need for more developers to create tools and innovations on-chain. One X user with the handle @0xNairolf said that the crypto industry needs to worry more about developer onboarding, rather than user onboarding. Others who agree with the user have pointed out that the crypto industry should focus on providing more tools to make it easier for developers to build more innovative apps on-chain. Some users have also underlined how developers are leaving crypto because the space has made it harder for them to build new projects because more complex innovations require niche coding language beyond their capabilities. (not so) hot take: crypto has a bigger developer onboarding problem than user onboarding In this case, vibe coding could solve the developer onboarding problem by lowering the technical entry barrier. Non-technical founders or teams with limited coding expertise can describe their ideas to AI and have it generate the underlying code necessary. This way, more people with unique ideas but no coding experience could join the crypto industry as builders and introduce new innovations through AI-generated coding. With the help of AI, teams could focus on the less technical aspect of establishing projects in the crypto space, like funding, tokenomics, user experience, and blockchain solutions. This method can be especially beneficial for complex crypto projects where aligning technical execution with broader economic or governance models is critical. In the crypto industry, where new protocols and regulatory changes emerge frequently, speed is a crucial element. Therefore, vibe coding could speed up the building process and allow teams to churn out new innovations to keep up with the demand of a rapidly evolving industry. Amid the discourse surrounding developer onboarding in the crypto space, one X user with the handle @metahacker argued that the problem does not lie with the lack of developers or tools in the space. Instead, they believe that the nature of crypto projects itself makes the technical foundation an even more determining factor. “The fact that you’re dealing with money AND smart contracts can’t be updated easily AND rampant exploits,” wrote @metahacker_ in their post. Therefore, the user discourages developers or project teams from relying on “the ‘vibe coding’ kind of tinkering.” As advanced as AI has become nowadays, there are still some flaws that can be found. AI-generated code can be messy and inconsistent. The code produced through vibe coding often lacks the structure and documentation of hand-written code. As projects grow, developers with limited technical knowledge will find it difficult to make updates or deploy system integrations. Another key factor to consider is security . When it comes to projects in the crypto industry, security is critical, even minor bugs or vulnerabilities can be disastrous. Without a deep understanding of the underlying logic, flaws might go unnoticed until they are exploited. For example, an Floridian entrepreneur used Cursor, an AI coding tool to develop a new enterprise-software app. He claimed that he built the app with “zero hand-written code” and that people were already paying for the app. However, two days later he announced that his software was “under attack.” Because he did not understand the technicalities of the app, he had a harder time solving the issues that arose. In the end, he “killed the app” and was forced to rebuild it. Overall, vibe coding does provides some advantages for the crypto industry, mainly in terms of lowering technical barriers and speeding up progress for building projects and tools. However, it also comes with drawbacks that emphasize how engineering capabilities and expert oversight are still key ingredients when it comes to building projects in the crypto industry.

Ethereum’s daily ETH burn rate, a key feature introduced by the 2021 EIP-1559 update to manage fees and supply, shows signs of declining, based on recent chart analysis highlighted by Miles Deutscher. The chart shows that Ethereum’s profitability is the lowest it has been in a long time, with ETH burns trending to zero. This implies reduced network usage or fees, which conflicts with Ethereum’s deflationary concept, which relies on burning more ETH than is issued to validators. The trend has sparked debate within the crypto community: some view it as a temporary lull before a possible recovery, while others express concern about profitability metrics and potential shifts in market sentiment. There could be several reasons why this is happening, but first, it’s prudent to understand what’s actually going on. Ethereum’s revenue is primarily driven by network activity, which generates transaction fees. Falling fees point to lower demand for block space, meaning fewer users are willing to pay high gas fees. Lower fee revenue can impact validators and Ethereum stakers, making ETH less attractive as a yield-generating asset. It’s hard to exactly pinpoint the reasons for Ethereum’s decline, but lower on-chain activity might be one. This means that Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem has slowed down, with lower trading volumes and fewer transactions on the mainnet. Then, since Ethereum’s burn mechanism is tied to gas fees, lower gas fees equals lower burns. Also, fewer high-fee transactions means less ETH is burned. All of this is mostly speculation at this point, but it’s worth noting that there doesn’t have to be cause for concern just yet. It might be still early to predict the outcome of the news, but there are at least a few options that should be noted. For instance, in the cases when burns outpace issuance, ETH becomes deflationary. A trend towards zero burns raises the possibility of the total ETH supply expanding again, which could impact its perceived long-term value narrative. Ethereum validators earn from transaction fees and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value). If fees remain low, staking rewards decrease, which would probably discourage participation in Ethereum staking. We have yet to see what will happen in the end, but if on-chain activity rebounds, either through new innovations, higher DeFi volumes, or something else, Ethereum’s burn rate and profitability could quickly recover. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Gamestop Corp. (NYSE: GME) announced on March 26 that it intends to raise $1.3 billion through a private offering of convertible senior notes, aiming to tap into institutional investment under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. The Texas-based company also revealed that it may grant initial purchasers the option to acquire an additional $200 million in notes within 13 days of issuance. These zero-interest, unsecured notes will mature on April 1, 2030, and the principal will not accrete over time. The company explained: Gamestop expects to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of bitcoin in a manner consistent with Gamestop’s Investment Policy. A key development accompanying the offering came one day earlier, when the board of directors approved a shift in the company’s investment policy. According to the announcement, the board “unanimously approved an update to its investment policy to add bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset.” The updated guidelines state: “The company’s investment policy permits investments in certain cryptocurrency assets, including bitcoin and U.S. dollar-denominated stable coins.” According to its financial statements, Gamestop reported year-end cash and cash equivalents of $4.757 billion. The notes will be convertible into cash, Class A common stock, or a mix of both, depending on the company’s election. Final terms such as the conversion rate and redemption rights will be determined at pricing, based on the U.S. composite volume weighted average price of Gamestop’s Class A shares between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Eastern. Gamestop’s strategy bears resemblance to one already used by Microstrategy (Nasdaq: MSTR), which recently rebranded as Strategy. The software intelligence firm has accumulated approximately 506,137 BTC as of March 23. Strategy used a combination of equity offerings and convertible debt to fund its digital asset acquisitions. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor calls Gamestop’s bitcoin move “a step in the right direction.” Gamestop’s plan underscores a broader trend of corporations leveraging debt instruments to gain exposure to cryptocurrency. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到[email protected]，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Amitis Capital CIO: 99% of crypto tokens likely headed to zero Chris Solarz, CIO of Amitis Capital, says 99% of crypto tokens lack long-term value and are likely to go to zero. He sees strong potential in crypto hedge funds, calling this a "golden age" due to low competition and