Cena ConstitutionDAOPEOPLE

A debate recently unfolded in the crypto community over the differences in how XRP and Bitcoin are promoted. An XRP supporter pointed out that Ripple executives—including CEO Brad Garlinghouse and CTO David Schwartz—have never actively encouraged people to buy XRP. This was contrasted with MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor, who consistently advocates for Bitcoin. The supporter implied that assets requiring direct promotion might have underlying weaknesses, sparking responses from the community. Crypto commentator CryptoApostle responded by highlighting the difference in supply between Bitcoin’s 21 million coins and XRP’s 100 billion. He suggested that Bitcoin’s scarcity makes it more necessary to “point people in the right direction,” implying that XRP does not face the same limitations. However, Ripple’s David Schwartz challenged this perspective, arguing that supply comparisons between XRP and Bitcoin are often misleading. Related: Ripple CTO Challenges Bitcoin Supply Scarcity Claims in Heated Debate Specifically, Schwartz emphasized that measuring crypto assets in “full coins” without considering market cap or divisibility leads to misinformation. He compared it to measuring distances in inches versus miles, saying such comparisons distort the true value and utility of each asset. CryptoApostle maintained that people naturally compare whole coins rather than smaller units like satoshis or drops. He also pointed out that Ripple’s partnerships with banks indirectly market XRP, even if executives do not explicitly promote buying it. Related: Ripple CTO Makes The Case For XRP Inclusion in Crypto Stockpile Meanwhile, Schwartz maintained that supply and price-per-coin are often misused in investment decisions. He noted that some investors believe XRP is a better buy simply because it appears cheaper per unit compared to Bitcoin—a narrative he believes is harmful. “You can’t compare the prices for ‘one coin’ for precisely the same reason you can’t compare the supplies measured in ‘number of coins,'” Schwartz stated , reinforcing the importance of accurate comparisons. Essentially, the discussion highlights the issue of evaluating crypto assets based on supply or unit price rather than fundamental value. It stresses that market participants must look beyond surface-level comparisons to make informed decisions. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Fellow Pioneers, the Battle is On! We’ve held the line against the whale’s attack, but now it’s time to push back! Their sell walls are strong, but our collective power is stronger. Every buy order, every show of support, chips away at their grip. We are not just traders—we are defenders of decentralization, protectors of the future. Stand firm. Buy what you can. Hold with conviction. Let’s turn the tide and show them that this market belongs to the people, not the manipulators. Together, we rise! 🚀🔥

would i be correct in thinking that once feb 28th comes and people have not transfered to main net there will be less pi and its price will increase?

$PI ⚡Pi Network: From High Hopes to Reality – Are Holders Satisfied? When Pi Network was still in its early days, many people had sky-high expectations for its price. Some firmly believed it would launch at $30+, while others were convinced it would skyrocket to $314 or even a mind-blowing $31,459+ per Pi. The belief in these numbers created an atmosphere of excitement, anticipation, and speculation. However, reality painted a different picture. Pi reached an all-time high of only ~$2.88, a far cry from what many had envisioned. This unexpected outcome shattered expectations and left many early believers questioning whether Pi’s value would ever reach the heights they had once imagined. For some, this price level was disappointing, as they had hoped for financial freedom through their Pi holdings. Others, however, still hold onto the belief that Pi's real potential is yet to be unlocked once the Open Mainnet launches and full utility kicks in. Now, the question remains—are Pi holders happy with this pricing? Do you still believe in the future of Pi, or has this price action changed your perception of the project? Let’s discuss! 👇

if people mostly say hold it, you should definitely sell it